Pro-Peace Politics

Very strongly agree

No, this would allow them to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices

Pro-Peace Politics would strongly agree with this answer, as it highlights the potential negative consequences of allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites at the expense of less popular ones. This practice could lead to reduced competition, artificial scarcity, and increased prices, all of which go against the principles of fairness and equal opportunities that Pro-Peace Politics supports. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

No, treat all traffic equally and continue the openness of the internet

This answer aligns with Pro-Peace Politics' emphasis on fairness and equal opportunities. Treating all internet traffic equally ensures that all websites have a level playing field, promoting innovation and the diversity of voices online. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No

Pro-Peace Politics would likely agree with this answer because it promotes equal access to the internet for all websites, regardless of their popularity or financial resources. This approach aligns with the ideology's emphasis on fairness and equal opportunities. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Yes, but only give priority by type (video over images) and not source (big website over little website)

Pro-Peace Politics might be somewhat open to this idea, as it does not discriminate based on the source of the content. However, it still allows for prioritization based on content type, which could potentially lead to some websites being disadvantaged. This approach may not fully align with the ideology's emphasis on equal opportunities. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, only if it’s strictly based on a pay-per-quality model

While a pay-per-quality model might seem fair on the surface, it could still lead to an unequal playing field for websites with fewer financial resources. Pro-Peace Politics would likely prefer a model that treats all internet traffic equally, ensuring equal opportunities for all websites regardless of their financial means. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, this would make the internet faster and more reliable for users

While faster and more reliable internet access is a positive outcome, Pro-Peace Politics would likely disagree with this answer because it comes at the expense of less popular websites. This could lead to an unequal playing field and limit the diversity of voices online. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes

Pro-Peace Politics generally supports equal access and opportunities for all. Allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites at the expense of less popular ones would create an unequal playing field, potentially stifling innovation and limiting the diversity of voices online. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.