You believe that diplomatic and nonviolent solutions can lead to a more harmonious and cooperative global community.
Pro-Peace Politics is a political ideology that emphasizes the promotion of peace, diplomacy, and non-violence as the primary means to resolve conflicts, both domestically and internationally. This ideology is often associated with pacifism, but it is not limited to it. Pro-Peace Politics advocates for the use of peaceful negotiations, diplomacy, and international cooperation as opposed to military force or violence. It also supports the idea of disarmament, reduction of military spending, and the prevention of wars.
The history of Pro-Peace Politics can be traced back to ancient time…
Read more@ISIDEWITH6mos6MO
Can a country be safe and respected without a strong military force?
@9H942Z86mos6MO
I believe a country should have sense of defense and leisure at the same time
@9H98L8N6mos6MO
I do not think a country can be safe AND respected without a strong military force. A country without a strong military can be thought of as a city or town with no policemen or sheriffs, it wouldn't be safe. I´m also not sure that other countries would think of us as a strong country as a whole without a strong military force behind us.
@9H96NVV6mos6MO
Yes, provided it does not need a strong military force and spends the money that would otherwise be used for military spending on progressive and positive projects.
@9H95XMX6mos6MO
No because there are serious threats that sometimes need strong military force to deal with.
@ISIDEWITH2mos2MO
What impact do you think a global treaty on complete disarmament would have on future generations?
@9LFK3KQ1mo1MO
I think it would bring peace to the world. With no weapons to fight everyone is forced to talk it our like a rational person.
@9LJY87DLibertarian1mo1MO
it would weaken those countries that actually would want peace, leaving them with no weapons. There is always going to be wicked people so we just can't trust that every country is going to want peace and abide by those rules. We will need weapons to defend ourselves or go to war if necessary.
@9LFLRP91mo1MO
The only weapons had if firearms and general weapons are out of the question are your own body and those you make yourself. We would have to either talk like rational people, or fight it out gladiator style, 1-on-1 fights. Either way a more enjoyable world with less wars, and just entertainment style fighting duals when we must resort to violence.
@9LGB9FKIndependent1mo1MO
Although it may bring peace among many, if one went against the treaty and attacked those without weaponry to defend themselves, it may cause greater conflict. Future generations may be in a world of peace that could be suddenly disrupted by those whom don't follow the treaty.
@9LGN88GWomen’s Equality1mo1MO
absolutely, if a treaty is followed in which arms are prohibited it would be unrealistic to believe it to be successful as it would be very easily and catastrophically violated.
@9LFMFQM1mo1MO
It will impact future generations in every way possible, the way they live, the way they think, the control that they are under.
@9LFL46X1mo1MO
Criminals, and other people who seek to harm will still continue to have them illiegally, so it will only hurt the unarmed
@ISIDEWITH5mos5MO
How could practices like meditation and mindfulness contribute to world peace?
@9J5VN7K4mos4MO
Meditation can give you a sense of calm, peace and balance that can benefit your emotional well-being and your overall health
@9J6C9S94mos4MO
I would say that this can benefit your well being because as much as physical health matter our mental and emotional well being is vitally important
@9J5Z5YF4mos4MO
I do not really think that these practices will help a noticeable amount, however I think that the promotion of healthy destressing and emotional awareness techniques is good.
@9J5W9XLWomen’s Equality4mos4MO
It probably could help world peace as everyone starts to calm down but I still don't feel there will always be peace.
@9J5VNJG4mos4MO
It could cause people to be less stress and paranode
@ISIDEWITH4mos4MO
What does it take to forgive someone, and how is forgiveness related to peace?
@9JNY6NC3mos3MO
They need to apologize and take steps to fix their behavior. Forgiveness can lead to peace.
@9JP5PTVLibertarian3mos3MO
If someone was abusive in the past, they might not be able to be forgiven by any victims, but they can still move on and at least own up to what they had done, taking steps to prevent the situation from repeating or becoming another cycle.
@9JP27VJ 3mos3MO
Forgiveness is only given to those who deserve it, or pays the time to claim forgiveness.
@9JNY4XN3mos3MO
I believe the only way to show forgiveness is through actions and showing how a person has changed.
@ISIDEWITH2mos2MO
If we could spread one message worldwide to promote peace, what should that message be?
@9KYQHJY2mos2MO
Achieving world peace would begin an age a prosperity and utopia of which humanity has never seen.
@9KYQD492mos2MO
Think before you act because everyone has emotions.
stop shooting each other or we're gonna shoot you and our guns are bigger. we are no longer picking sides and if an arrangement cant be made nations that have been warring for decades will be occupied by the United States
@ISIDEWITH3mos3MO
Do you believe that personal peace is connected to global peace, and if so, how?
@9KM82572mos2MO
I feel as if once people have personal peace then they're more willing to move on to global peace
@9KM7KZK2mos2MO
The peace is come from yourself And your neighbors. And the political persons get those persons they did't do what the political persons want.
@9KM72K42mos2MO
IT IS IF PERSONAL PEACE IS PRACTICED BY MOST IF NOT ALL.
@ISIDEWITH4mos4MO
What's your vision for a peaceful society and what do you think is the biggest obstacle to achieving it?
@9JNJVF2 3mos3MO
More government assistance: as in, funding for public education and public transportation, as well as socialized medicine.
@9JNJCWV3mos3MO
I don't think there is a thing as "peaceful society" because there is always someone who will want something more, and that will cause destruction to others.
@9JNJBWPIndependent3mos3MO
Realistically I don't think there is such a thing as a peaceful society human have minds of our own and it is what you do to help you community be better but there will never be a peaceful society.
@ISIDEWITH5mos5MO
@ISIDEWITH5mos5MO
In a world often focused on competition, how can we promote cooperation instead?
@9J2K7DJ4mos4MO
I don't believe would ever be able to fully get rid of competition between people, but creating and promoting situations that would elimate the need for it could be more beneficial.
@9J2JMST4mos4MO
We can promote cooperation by encouraging civil discourse with the intent to listen, understand, negotiate, and compromise rather than to "win."
@ISIDEWITH6mos6MO
If you were in charge, how would you use diplomacy to address a current global conflict?
@9HLCPH5Progressive5mos5MO
Set up meetings and conferences to have actual conversations instead of resulting to violence and war. let people talk it out and come up with a solution
@9HLC9GV5mos5MO
I would use diplomacy to help with the russia ukraine war with the use of the power the U.S holds in order to be a facilitator to the peace talks between the two.
I am more of a Pokemon fan, so I would just make all the world leaders come together, try to battle a little, realize how terrible it is to play Pokemon, and just decide that hell will be like that and deal with the problem so that they do not end up there, just like my grandma when she told me I could not eat another cookie.
@ISIDEWITH6mos6MO
If two countries are at odds, is it always better to discuss than to fight, even if one is clearly in the wrong?
@9HDNZJL6mos6MO
It's always better to discuss than to start a war especially if there is a party that's clearly in the wrong because even though the right side of the argument or discussion is right and make good points, they also might not have the recourses to go into a fight.
@9HDP2G26mos6MO
some times yes, you can talk things out but often when a country is in the wrong they seek to illiminatte the opposing nation and its people making fighting the only option.
Esta muy bien siempre discutirlo antes de llegarlo a mayor, no solo son los militares que son afectados por este.
The historical activity of users engaging with this answer.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
