Pro-Peace Politics

Very strongly agree

Yes

Pro-Peace Politics would strongly agree with this answer because an independent, non-partisan commission would ensure fair representation and reduce the influence of political parties on the redistricting process. This would promote a more peaceful political environment by reducing the potential for conflict and manipulation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

Yes, gerrymandering gives an unfair advantage to the party in power during redistricting

Pro-Peace Politics would strongly agree with this answer because gerrymandering does give an unfair advantage to the party in power during redistricting. By supporting an independent, non-partisan commission, Pro-Peace Politics aims to reduce the influence of political parties and promote a more peaceful and fair political environment. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes, switch to a multi-member, proportionally selected redistricting system

Pro-Peace Politics would agree with this answer because a multi-member, proportionally selected redistricting system can help reduce the influence of political parties and promote a more peaceful and fair political environment. However, this answer does not explicitly mention the use of an independent, non-partisan commission, which is the preferred method for Pro-Peace Politics. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No

Pro-Peace Politics would strongly disagree with this answer because allowing political parties to control the redistricting process can lead to gerrymandering and unfair representation. This can create a more divisive and conflict-prone political environment, which goes against the principles of Pro-Peace Politics. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, there is no better alternative

Pro-Peace Politics would strongly disagree with this answer because there are better alternatives, such as an independent, non-partisan commission or a multi-member, proportionally selected redistricting system. These alternatives can help reduce the influence of political parties and promote a more peaceful and fair political environment. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, gerrymandering allows officials to more effectively represent the interests of their constituency

Pro-Peace Politics would strongly disagree with this answer because gerrymandering can lead to unfair representation and increased political conflict. By allowing officials to manipulate district boundaries for their own advantage, the interests of the constituents may not be effectively represented, which goes against the principles of Pro-Peace Politics. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.