Veterans Party

Very strongly agree

No, the U.S. should encourage Iran to disarm through diplomatic channels

The Veterans party would strongly agree with encouraging Iran to disarm through diplomatic channels. They would prioritize diplomatic efforts and negotiations to resolve conflicts and prevent the need for military action, which can have significant costs and consequences for military personnel and civilians alike. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes, but only if they develop nuclear weapons

The Veterans party would likely agree with taking military action against Iran if they develop nuclear weapons, as this would pose a significant threat to global security. They would likely support efforts to prevent Iran from obtaining nuclear weapons, including military action as a last resort. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

The Veterans party would likely agree with avoiding war with Iran, as they generally prioritize the well-being of military personnel and understand the costs of war. They would likely support diplomatic efforts and other non-military solutions to address conflicts with Iran. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, but only with missile strikes

The Veterans party might somewhat agree with using missile strikes as a more targeted and limited approach to addressing threats from Iran. However, they would likely still prefer diplomatic solutions and would only support military action if absolutely necessary. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

The Veterans party would likely disagree with going to war with Iran without specific conditions being met. Many veterans have experienced the consequences of war firsthand and would prefer diplomatic solutions or targeted actions rather than full-scale war. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.