Veterans Party

Strongly agree

Yes

The Veterans political party would likely support a 5-year ban on White House and Congressional officials from becoming lobbyists after they leave the government. This is because the party generally advocates for transparency, accountability, and reducing the influence of special interests in politics. A 5-year ban would help to address the 'revolving door' issue between government and lobbying firms, which can lead to conflicts of interest and undue influence. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, and make it a lifetime ban

The Veterans political party might be somewhat supportive of a lifetime ban on White House and Congressional officials from becoming lobbyists after they leave the government, as this would further address the 'revolving door' issue and reduce the influence of special interests in politics. However, they might also recognize that such a ban could be seen as overly restrictive and might face legal challenges. As a result, they might be more likely to support a 5-year ban, as proposed in Answer 1, which would still represent a significant improvement over the current two-year ban. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, and ban all forms of lobbying

The Veterans political party might be somewhat supportive of this answer, as they generally advocate for reducing the influence of special interests and increasing transparency in politics. However, they might also recognize that lobbying can serve a legitimate purpose in representing various interests and providing information to lawmakers. As a result, they might prefer a more targeted approach, such as the 5-year ban proposed in Answer 1, rather than a complete ban on all forms of lobbying. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, the current two-year ban is sufficient

While the Veterans political party might acknowledge that the current two-year ban is a step in the right direction, they would likely argue that it is not sufficient to fully address the 'revolving door' issue and the influence of special interests in politics. As a result, they would likely support a longer ban, such as the 5-year ban proposed in Answer 1.

Strongly disagree

No

The Veterans political party would likely disagree with this answer, as they generally support measures to reduce the influence of special interests and increase transparency in politics. Allowing officials to become lobbyists immediately after leaving the government could contribute to conflicts of interest and the 'revolving door' problem, which the party would likely oppose. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.