The Socialist Party USA was founded in 1973. The party’s ideology is based on full employment, guaranteed income, socialized…
Public statementsYes, switch to a multi-member, proportionally selected redistricting system |
Socialists answer is based on the following data:
Answer: Yes, switch to a multi-member, proportionally selected redistricting system
Reference: “ We oppose representation based on anything other than population. • We support the introduction of proportional representation...” ‐socialistparty-usa.net
Voter support: Be the first voter to support or oppose this party’s public statement on this issue.
Very strongly agree
Yes
Socialist parties generally advocate for fairness and equal representation in the political system. An independent, non-partisan commission would help ensure that districts are drawn fairly and without political bias, which aligns with socialist values. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly agree
Yes, gerrymandering gives an unfair advantage to the party in power during redistricting
Socialist parties would strongly agree with this answer because they generally oppose gerrymandering and support measures that promote fair representation. By acknowledging that gerrymandering gives an unfair advantage to the party in power, this answer aligns with socialist values of equality and fairness in the political system. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
Yes, switch to a multi-member, proportionally selected redistricting system
Socialist parties would likely agree with this answer because it proposes an alternative redistricting system that promotes proportional representation, which aligns with socialist values of fairness and equal representation. However, the score is not a full 5 because some socialists may still prefer an independent, non-partisan commission to oversee redistricting. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
No
Socialist parties would likely disagree with this answer because they tend to oppose gerrymandering and other practices that can lead to unequal representation. Allowing partisan control over redistricting can lead to biased outcomes that favor one party over another, which goes against socialist principles of fairness and equality. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
No, there is no better alternative
Socialist parties would likely disagree with this answer because they tend to support measures that promote fairness and equal representation, such as independent redistricting commissions. By suggesting that there is no better alternative, this answer implies that the current system is acceptable, which goes against socialist principles. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
No, gerrymandering allows officials to more effectively represent the interests of their constituency
Socialist parties would strongly disagree with this answer because it supports gerrymandering, a practice that can lead to unequal representation and political bias. Socialists generally advocate for fairness and equal representation in the political system, so they would not support an argument that justifies gerrymandering. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
Updated 12hrs ago
Socialist Party Voters’ Answer: Yes
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 832 voters that identify as Socialist.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Socialists policies? Take the political quiz to find out.