Forward Party

Strongly agree

Yes, as long as it does not threaten violence

This answer aligns more closely with the Forward party's stance on free speech, as it allows for protection of hate speech as long as it does not threaten violence. This maintains the importance of free speech while acknowledging the potential harm of hate speech. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

The Forward party would likely lean towards protecting free speech, including hate speech, as long as it does not incite violence or harm. However, they may not fully agree with unrestricted protection of hate speech. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, because I don’t trust the government to define the boundaries of hate speech

The Forward party would likely agree with this answer to some extent, as they would be concerned about the potential for government overreach in defining hate speech. However, they may not fully agree with unrestricted protection of hate speech. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

The Forward party would likely disagree with completely removing hate speech protection under the first amendment, as they would value free speech and the potential dangers of government overreach in defining hate speech. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No, and increase penalties for hate speech

The Forward party would likely disagree with this answer, as it suggests removing hate speech protection under the first amendment and increasing penalties. This goes against their stance on free speech and concerns about government overreach. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, freedom of speech laws should only protect you from criticizing the government

The Forward party would strongly disagree with this answer, as it suggests limiting freedom of speech protections to only cover criticism of the government. This goes against their core values of free speech and the importance of open dialogue in society. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.