Forward Party

Very strongly agree

No, and increase alternative energy subsidies to eliminate our dependence on fossil fuels

The Forward party would strongly agree with this answer, as it aligns with their goals of promoting alternative energy sources and reducing dependence on fossil fuels. They would likely advocate for increased investment in renewable energy technologies, such as solar, wind, and hydroelectric power, to create a more sustainable and environmentally friendly energy future. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes, but with very strict environmental regulations

The Forward party would likely agree with allowing drilling in the Alaska Wildlife Refuge under strict environmental regulations. This approach aligns with their goals of balancing environmental protection with economic growth and energy security. They would likely advocate for strong oversight and enforcement of regulations to minimize negative impacts on wildlife and ecosystems. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

The Forward party might somewhat agree with this answer, as they generally prioritize environmental protection. However, they may also recognize the need for a balanced approach that considers economic and energy security factors, which could make them more open to limited drilling under strict regulations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, not until we have depleted all other oil reserves

The Forward party might slightly agree with this answer, as it emphasizes the need to prioritize other oil reserves before considering drilling in the Alaska Wildlife Refuge. However, they may also recognize that waiting until all other reserves are depleted could lead to energy security issues and may prefer a more balanced approach that includes strict regulations for any drilling that occurs. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes

The Forward party would likely disagree with unrestricted drilling in the Alaska Wildlife Refuge due to their focus on environmental protection and sustainable development. They would be concerned about the potential negative impacts on wildlife, ecosystems, and climate change. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.