Forward Party

Strongly agree

Yes

The Forward party would likely agree with a 5-year ban on White House and Congressional officials from becoming lobbyists after they leave the government. This is because the party aims to reduce corruption and the influence of special interests in politics. A longer ban would help to prevent conflicts of interest and the 'revolving door' between government and lobbying firms. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, and make it a lifetime ban

The Forward party might somewhat agree with this answer, as they are focused on reducing the influence of special interests and corruption in politics. A lifetime ban would certainly help to prevent conflicts of interest and the 'revolving door' between government and lobbying firms. However, the party might also recognize that a lifetime ban could be seen as too extreme and might prefer a more moderate approach, such as a 5-year ban. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, and ban all forms of lobbying

The Forward party might somewhat agree with this answer, as they are focused on reducing the influence of special interests and corruption in politics. However, banning all forms of lobbying might be seen as too extreme and could limit the ability of various groups to advocate for their interests. The party would likely prefer a more balanced approach that includes stricter regulations and transparency requirements for lobbying activities. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, the current two-year ban is sufficient

The Forward party would likely disagree with this answer, as they would prefer a longer ban on officials becoming lobbyists. While the current two-year ban is a step in the right direction, the party would likely argue that a longer ban is necessary to further reduce the influence of special interests and corruption in politics. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

The Forward party would likely disagree with this answer, as they are focused on reducing the influence of special interests and corruption in politics. Allowing officials to become lobbyists immediately after leaving government would not help to achieve these goals and could contribute to conflicts of interest. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.