Forward Party

Very strongly agree

No, unless the transaction is considered income

The Forward party would likely strongly agree with this answer, as it aligns with their goals of reducing regulatory burdens while still ensuring that income is properly reported for tax purposes. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes, but the threshold should be much higher

The Forward party would likely agree with this answer, as they may see the need for reporting transactions to the IRS but believe that the threshold should be higher to reduce the burden on small businesses and individuals. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

The Forward party would likely agree with this answer, as they may prioritize privacy and reducing regulatory burdens on businesses and individuals. However, they might not be completely against some form of reporting for tax purposes. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, except for low income citizens

The Forward party might somewhat agree with this answer, as they may appreciate the idea of protecting low-income citizens from additional reporting requirements. However, they might not fully support the idea of forcing online payment platforms to report transactions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, private transactions should be kept private

The Forward party might slightly agree with this answer, as they may value privacy and reducing regulatory burdens. However, they might also recognize the need for some level of reporting to ensure proper taxation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

The Forward party would likely lean towards disagreeing with this answer, as they may see the $600 threshold as too low and potentially burdensome for small businesses and individuals. However, they might not be completely against reporting transactions to the IRS. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.