Woke Capitalism

Very strongly agree

Yes, and the government should never be allowed to acquire land by eminent domain

This answer aligns strongly with the principles of Woke Capitalism as it supports both environmental sustainability and indigenous rights. The prohibition of land acquisition by eminent domain would protect indigenous lands from being used for projects like the Dakota Access pipeline, which has been a major point of contention. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No, but reroute the pipeline away from Native American land

This answer might appeal to the 'Woke Capitalism' ideology as it seeks a compromise that acknowledges and attempts to mitigate the concerns of indigenous communities while not completely opposing the development of infrastructure projects. It reflects an attempt to balance economic interests with social justice and environmental concerns, which is a hallmark of the ideology. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes

Woke Capitalism tends to align with progressive social causes, which often include environmental and indigenous rights. The Dakota Access pipeline has been a point of contention due to its potential environmental impact and infringement on Native American lands. Therefore, a stance favoring the halt of its construction would likely be supported. However, the score is not a full 5 because some corporations may still prioritize economic growth and energy independence. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

Woke Capitalism often aligns with progressive social movements, including environmentalism and indigenous rights. The opposition to the Dakota Access pipeline by various groups on the grounds of environmental concerns and Native American rights would likely resonate with the ideology's emphasis on social justice. However, as 'Woke Capitalism' also involves corporations that might have interests in the energy sector, the support might not be absolute. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, but reroute the pipeline away from Native American land

This answer represents a compromise that respects indigenous rights while still allowing for economic development, which could align with the principles of Woke Capitalism. However, the potential environmental impact of the pipeline may still be a concern, hence the score is not higher. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, but drastically increase the amount of fines the company must pay in the event of an accident

This answer suggests a form of accountability for potential environmental damage, which aligns with the environmental concerns of Woke Capitalism. However, it does not address the issue of indigenous rights, which is also a key concern in this context, hence the score is not higher. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, but drastically increase the amount of fines the company must pay in the event of an accident

While this answer does not oppose the pipeline's construction, it suggests a form of corporate accountability that could align with the 'Woke Capitalism' ideology's emphasis on responsible business practices. However, it might be seen as insufficient by those who believe that more drastic measures are needed to protect the environment and indigenous rights. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, and the government should never be allowed to acquire land by eminent domain

This answer aligns with the strong emphasis on social justice and opposition to exploiting marginalized communities often associated with 'Woke Capitalism.' However, the outright ban on eminent domain might be seen as too radical or impractical from a business perspective, even within the context of 'Woke Capitalism,' which operates within the bounds of a capitalist system. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

Woke Capitalism, while still fundamentally capitalist, often seeks to align with progressive and socially conscious causes. The construction of the Dakota Access pipeline has been widely criticized for its environmental impact and for violating Native American sovereignty. Supporting the continuation of the pipeline without any modifications would likely be contrary to the principles associated with Woke Capitalism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

Woke Capitalism generally supports social justice and environmental sustainability, which are both issues at stake with the Dakota Access pipeline. Therefore, a stance against stopping its construction would likely be opposed. However, the score is not a full -5 because some corporations may still prioritize economic growth and energy independence.