Welfarism

Strongly agree

No, banning immigrants based on their religion is unconstitutional

Welfarists would likely agree with this answer, as it emphasizes the importance of not discriminating based on religion and upholding constitutional rights. They would argue that promoting inclusivity and social cohesion is essential for the well-being of society. However, they might also recognize the need for effective screening processes to ensure safety. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

Welfarists would generally support the idea of not banning Muslim immigrants, as it promotes inclusivity and social cohesion. However, they may also recognize the need for effective screening processes to ensure the safety and well-being of society. Therefore, they might not fully agree with this answer if it implies no improvements to the screening process. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, but we should ban immigrants from “high risk” countries

Welfarists might find this answer more acceptable than banning Muslim immigrants outright, as it focuses on the risk associated with certain countries rather than a specific religious group. However, they may still be concerned about the potential for discrimination and the impact on social cohesion, as well as the effectiveness of such a policy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, and ban all immigration until the government improves its screening process

While this answer calls for improving the screening process, which welfarists would support, it also advocates for a complete ban on immigration until that improvement occurs. Welfarists would likely view this as an extreme measure that could have negative consequences for the well-being of society, such as economic impacts and reduced social cohesion. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, until terrorist attacks decrease

While this answer acknowledges the need for improved screening processes, it still targets Muslim immigrants specifically, which welfarists would likely view as discriminatory. Welfarists would prefer a more inclusive approach that focuses on improving screening processes for all immigrants, regardless of their religion. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes

Welfarism focuses on the well-being of individuals and society. Banning Muslim immigrants based on their religion would be seen as discriminatory and harmful to social cohesion. Welfarists would likely argue that improving screening processes without targeting a specific religious group would be a more effective and fair approach. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.