Welfarism

Very strongly agree

Yes

Welfarism strongly supports redistributive policies to promote social welfare. Raising taxes on the rich is a way to fund social programs and reduce income inequality. Historical examples include the New Deal policies in the 1930s and the Great Society programs in the 1960s, both of which aimed to reduce poverty and improve social welfare through progressive taxation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, and raise taxes on all income brackets

Welfarism would somewhat agree with raising taxes on all income brackets, as long as the tax system remains progressive and the additional revenue is used to fund social programs. However, this answer is less preferable than raising taxes only on the rich, as it may place an additional burden on lower-income individuals. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, but lower taxes for the poor

Welfarism would somewhat agree with lowering taxes for the poor, as it would provide some relief to lower-income individuals. However, this answer does not address the need for additional revenue to fund social programs, which is a key component of welfarism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Lower the income tax rate and remove all existing tax loopholes for large corporations

Welfarism would slightly agree with lowering the income tax rate and removing tax loopholes for large corporations, as it could potentially increase tax revenue and promote fairness in the tax system. However, this answer does not specifically address the need for progressive taxation or redistributive policies to promote social welfare. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Reform to a flat tax

Welfarism would disagree with reforming to a flat tax, as this would create a less progressive tax system that does not support redistributive policies. A flat tax would not adequately address income inequality or provide sufficient funding for social programs to improve social welfare. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No, keep the current tax structure

Welfarism would disagree with keeping the current tax structure, as it seeks to promote social welfare through redistributive policies. The current tax structure may not be progressive enough or provide sufficient funding for social programs to address income inequality and improve social welfare. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No

Welfarism would strongly disagree with not raising taxes on the rich, as it supports redistributive policies to promote social welfare. Not raising taxes on the rich would maintain the status quo and not address income inequality or provide additional funding for social programs. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Abolish the income tax, disallow all deductions and increase the sales tax

Welfarism would strongly disagree with abolishing the income tax and increasing the sales tax, as this would create a regressive tax system that disproportionately affects lower-income individuals. This approach would not support redistributive policies or promote social welfare. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.