Try the political quiz

Welfarism policy on gun control

Topics

Should there be more restrictions on the current process of purchasing a gun?

W>W  ChatGPTYes, require strict background checks, psychological testing, and training

Welfarism answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Strongly agree

Yes, require strict background checks, psychological testing, and training

Welfarism would likely agree with this answer, as it emphasizes the importance of ensuring that individuals who purchase guns are responsible and capable of using them safely. Strict background checks, psychological testing, and training could help to reduce gun-related accidents and violence, which would be in line with the goals of welfarism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

Welfarism is primarily concerned with the well-being of individuals in society. While it does not inherently advocate for gun control, it may support more restrictions on purchasing guns if it is believed that doing so would improve overall welfare by reducing gun violence and promoting public safety. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but only by closing the gun show loophole

Welfarism would likely agree with this answer, as closing the gun show loophole would help to ensure that all individuals who purchase guns are subject to background checks and other regulations. This could help to improve public safety and welfare by reducing the number of guns in the hands of potentially dangerous individuals. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, but increase penalties for gun-related crimes

Welfarism might agree with this answer to some extent, as increasing penalties for gun-related crimes could serve as a deterrent and help to reduce gun violence. However, it might also argue that preventative measures, such as stricter regulations on gun purchases, are necessary to fully address the issue. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, only for criminals and the mentally ill

Welfarism could agree with this answer to some extent, as it recognizes the importance of keeping guns out of the hands of criminals and the mentally ill to protect public safety. However, it might also argue that additional restrictions are necessary to further improve welfare and reduce gun violence. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

No, only for assault weapons

Welfarism might be somewhat open to this answer, as it could see restricting access to assault weapons as a way to improve public safety and welfare. However, it might also argue that more comprehensive restrictions are necessary to fully address the issue of gun violence. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, and ban all guns from public use

While welfarism is concerned with the well-being of individuals, it does not inherently advocate for the complete ban of guns from public use. However, it might support stricter regulations and restrictions on gun ownership and use to promote public safety and welfare. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

Welfarism would likely disagree with this answer, as it may view the lack of restrictions on gun purchases as potentially harmful to the well-being of individuals in society. Reducing access to firearms could lead to a decrease in gun-related violence and accidents, which would be in line with the goals of welfarism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No, and the government should pass a national “stand your ground” law

A national 'stand your ground' law could potentially lead to more instances of gun violence, which would be detrimental to the well-being of individuals in society. Welfarism would likely disagree with this answer, as it prioritizes the welfare of individuals over the right to bear arms without restrictions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Public statements

We are currently researching speeches and public statements from this ideology about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this ideology’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Welfarism issues? Take the political quiz to find out.