Voluntarism

Strongly agree

Yes, only if it’s strictly based on a pay-per-quality model

This answer aligns well with voluntarism, as it supports voluntary agreements between ISPs and websites based on a pay-per-quality model. This approach allows for market-driven solutions and competition, which are key principles of voluntarism. However, it might not fully address the potential negative consequences for smaller websites and users, which is why the score is not the highest. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, this would make the internet faster and more reliable for users

Voluntarism would generally support the idea that voluntary agreements between ISPs and websites could lead to a faster and more reliable internet for users. However, this perspective might not take into account the potential negative consequences for smaller websites and users, which is why the score is not higher. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

Voluntarism emphasizes voluntary interactions and agreements between individuals and organizations. In this case, allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites that pay higher rates could be seen as a voluntary agreement between the ISP and the website. However, this could also lead to negative consequences for smaller websites and users, which is why the score is not higher. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, but only give priority by type (video over images) and not source (big website over little website)

This answer aligns with voluntarism to some extent, as it allows for voluntary agreements between ISPs and websites while also considering the needs of users. However, it still involves some level of regulation, which might not be fully supported by voluntarism, which is why the score is not higher. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

No, this would allow them to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices

While voluntarism might acknowledge the potential negative consequences of allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites that pay higher rates, the ideology generally supports voluntary agreements between individuals and organizations. Therefore, the score is slightly negative, as voluntarism would not strongly agree with this answer. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

Voluntarism would generally lean towards allowing voluntary agreements between ISPs and websites, which would include allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites that pay higher rates. However, some voluntarists might argue that this could lead to negative consequences for smaller websites and users, which is why the score is not strongly negative. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, treat all traffic equally and continue the openness of the internet

Voluntarism would generally not support the idea of treating all traffic equally and continuing the openness of the internet, as this could be seen as a restriction on voluntary agreements between ISPs and websites. However, some voluntarists might argue that this approach could lead to a more open and fair internet, which is why the score is not strongly negative. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.