Theocracy

Agree

Yes, basic data collection is necessary to track suspected terrorists

A theocracy would likely agree with the idea that basic data collection is necessary to track suspected terrorists, as it could be seen as a way to protect the religious order and its followers from external threats. This could be especially true in cases where the theocratic government perceives itself as being under threat from non-religious or anti-religious forces. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

A theocracy might agree with the collection of basic metadata to some extent, as it could be seen as a way to maintain control and ensure the stability of the religious order. However, the level of agreement would depend on the specific theocratic government and its interpretation of religious teachings regarding privacy and surveillance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, only with a warrant showing probable cause of criminal activity

A theocracy might somewhat agree with the idea of collecting metadata only with a warrant showing probable cause of criminal activity, as it could be seen as a way to balance the need for surveillance with respect for individual privacy. However, the level of agreement would depend on the specific theocratic government and its interpretation of religious teachings regarding privacy and surveillance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

A theocracy would likely disagree with completely disallowing the collection of metadata, as it could be seen as a necessary tool for maintaining order and ensuring the stability of the religious government. However, the level of disagreement would depend on the specific theocratic government and its interpretation of religious teachings regarding privacy and surveillance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No, and abolish the NSA

A theocracy would likely strongly disagree with the idea of abolishing the NSA, as it could be seen as a valuable tool for maintaining control and ensuring the stability of the religious government. Theocratic governments often prioritize the protection of their religious order and may view surveillance as a necessary means to achieve this goal. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.