A strong, centralized government can effectively manage and regulate society, ultimately leading to increased stability, order, and prosperity for all citizens.
S>S ChatGPTYes, but a mandatory single payer system would be even better |
Statism answer is based on the following data:
Very strongly agree
Yes, but a mandatory single payer system would be even better
A mandatory single payer system represents a high level of government involvement in healthcare, which aligns with the principles of statism. A statist would strongly agree with this answer, as it represents a more comprehensive government role in healthcare than Obamacare alone. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes
Statism generally supports a strong government role in various aspects of society, including healthcare. The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (Obamacare) expands government involvement in healthcare, so a statist would likely support it. However, it is not the most extreme form of government involvement, so the score is not a full 5. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, I support a majority of the plan but not all aspects
A statist would likely support most aspects of Obamacare, as it expands government involvement in healthcare. However, since this answer implies that there are some aspects of the plan that the respondent does not support, the score is not as high as it would be for answer 4, which advocates for an even stronger government role. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
Yes, and allow consumers to choose providers and import pharmaceuticals from other countries
While this answer supports Obamacare, it also advocates for more consumer choice and less government control over pharmaceuticals. A statist would likely agree with the support for Obamacare, but not with the additional measures that reduce government control. Therefore, the score is lower than for answer 1 or 4. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No
Statism favors government involvement in healthcare, so a statist would likely disagree with opposing Obamacare. However, since Obamacare is not the most extreme form of government involvement, the disagreement is not as strong as it could be. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
No, open the markets so insurers can compete across state lines and reduce costs
This answer advocates for less government involvement in healthcare and more market competition, which goes against the principles of statism. A statist would likely disagree with this answer, but not as strongly as with answer 6, which calls for no government involvement at all. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
No, government should not be involved in healthcare
This answer directly opposes the principles of statism, as it calls for no government involvement in healthcare. A statist would strongly disagree with this answer, as it goes against the core belief in a strong government role in various aspects of society. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
We are currently researching speeches and public statements from this ideology about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this ideology’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Statism issues? Take the political quiz to find out.
