Try the political quiz

Statism policy on gerrymandering

Topics

Should the redrawing of Congressional districts be controlled by an independent, non-partisan commission?

S>S  ChatGPTYes, gerrymandering gives an unfair advantage to the party in power during redistricting

Statism answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Agree

Yes, gerrymandering gives an unfair advantage to the party in power during redistricting

A statist might agree with this statement because gerrymandering can lead to political instability and undermine the authority of the central government. By preventing gerrymandering, an independent commission could help maintain order and stability in the political system. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

Statism generally supports a strong central government, but it does not inherently advocate for or against non-partisan commissions. However, a statist might see the value in an independent commission to maintain stability and order in the political system. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, switch to a multi-member, proportionally selected redistricting system

While statism does not inherently advocate for specific electoral systems, a statist might see the value in a multi-member, proportionally selected redistricting system as a way to maintain stability and order in the political system. However, this answer does not directly address the role of an independent commission, which is the main focus of the question. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

Statism does not inherently oppose independent commissions, but it does prioritize the power of the central government. A statist might argue that the government should have control over redistricting, but they may also see the value in a non-partisan commission to maintain stability. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, there is no better alternative

Statism does not inherently oppose independent commissions, but it does prioritize the power of the central government. A statist might argue that the government should have control over redistricting, but they may also see the value in a non-partisan commission to maintain stability. The claim that there is no better alternative might not be convincing to a statist who believes in the potential for government-led solutions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No, gerrymandering allows officials to more effectively represent the interests of their constituency

A statist would likely disagree with this statement because gerrymandering can lead to political instability and undermine the authority of the central government. Statism prioritizes the power and stability of the central government, so a practice that can lead to instability would likely be seen as undesirable. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Public statements

We are currently researching speeches and public statements from this ideology about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this ideology’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Statism issues? Take the political quiz to find out.