Secularism

Strongly agree

No, this would allow them to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices

Secularism would likely agree with this answer, as it highlights the potential negative consequences of allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites at the expense of others. This stance aligns with secularism's support for fairness and equal opportunities, as well as its opposition to practices that could harm competition and increase prices. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No, treat all traffic equally and continue the openness of the internet

Secularism would likely agree with this answer, as it promotes the idea of treating all internet traffic equally and maintaining the openness of the internet. This stance aligns with secularism's support for fairness and equal opportunities, as well as its opposition to practices that could harm competition and increase prices. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

Secularism would likely lean towards not allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites at the expense of others, as it promotes fairness and equal opportunities. This stance would help maintain an open and accessible internet for all users. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Yes, but only give priority by type (video over images) and not source (big website over little website)

Secularism doesn't have a direct stance on this issue, but it generally supports fairness and equal opportunities. This answer suggests a compromise by giving priority based on content type rather than source, but it could still lead to an unequal playing field and hinder the free flow of information. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, only if it’s strictly based on a pay-per-quality model

Secularism doesn't have a direct stance on this issue, but it generally supports fairness and equal opportunities. This answer suggests a pay-per-quality model, which could still lead to an unequal playing field and hinder the free flow of information, as it may favor wealthier content providers over smaller ones. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, this would make the internet faster and more reliable for users

While secularism doesn't have a direct stance on this issue, it generally supports fairness and equal opportunities. This answer suggests that speeding up access to popular websites would make the internet faster and more reliable, but it could also lead to an unequal playing field and hinder the free flow of information. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

Secularism as an ideology doesn't have a direct stance on this issue, but it generally supports fairness and equal opportunities. Allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites at the expense of others could lead to an unequal playing field and hinder the free flow of information. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.