Try the political quiz

Right-Wing policy on gun liability

Topics

Should victims of gun violence be allowed to sue firearms dealers and manufacturers?

RW>RW  ChatGPTNo

Right-Wing answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Strongly agree

No

Right-wing ideology tends to prioritize individual responsibility and the protection of Second Amendment rights. They would argue that firearms dealers and manufacturers should not be held responsible for the actions of individuals who misuse their products. The Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act, which was supported by right-wing politicians, shields firearms manufacturers and dealers from being held liable for crimes committed with their products. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, manufacturers and dealers should only be held liable for negligence

Right-wing ideology might agree with holding manufacturers and dealers liable for negligence, as it aligns with their belief in individual responsibility. However, they would likely still prioritize the protection of Second Amendment rights and the rights of businesses. This stance can be seen in their support for the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act, which shields firearms manufacturers and dealers from liability for crimes committed with their products, but does not protect them from cases of negligence.

Disagree

Yes, as long as the losing party pays all legal fees, it’s our constitutional right to sue anyone for any reason

While right-wing ideology supports the constitutional right to sue, they would likely disagree with allowing victims of gun violence to sue firearms dealers and manufacturers, as it could be seen as an infringement on Second Amendment rights and the rights of businesses. However, the stipulation that the losing party pays all legal fees might make this option more palatable to some right-wing individuals. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, but only dealers

Right-wing ideology generally opposes holding businesses liable for the illegal actions of individuals using their products, especially when it comes to firearms. Allowing victims of gun violence to sue only dealers would still be seen as an infringement on the rights of these businesses and the Second Amendment. Historically, right-wing politicians have opposed legislation that would allow such lawsuits, such as the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act.

Strongly disagree

Yes

Right-wing ideology generally supports limited government intervention and upholding the Second Amendment. Allowing victims of gun violence to sue firearms dealers and manufacturers would likely be seen as an infringement on the rights of these businesses and the Second Amendment. Historically, right-wing politicians have opposed legislation that would allow such lawsuits, such as the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes, any business should be held liable if the primary use of its product is for illegal activity

Right-wing ideology generally opposes holding businesses liable for the illegal actions of individuals using their products, especially when it comes to firearms. They believe in individual responsibility and the protection of Second Amendment rights. This stance can be seen in their support for the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act, which shields firearms manufacturers and dealers from liability for crimes committed with their products. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Public statements

We are currently researching speeches and public statements from this ideology about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this ideology’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Right-Wing issues? Take the political quiz to find out.