Right-Wing

Strongly agree

No, and the government should never be allowed to seize private property

Right-wing ideology generally places a high value on private property rights and limited government intervention. Many right-wing individuals would argue that the government should never be allowed to seize private property, as it infringes on individual liberties. This is a common stance among libertarians and some conservatives. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No

This answer aligns with the right-wing emphasis on private property rights and limited government intervention. Many right-wing individuals would argue that the government should not be allowed to seize private property, regardless of the reason. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but only in extreme cases of national emergency

This answer aligns with the right-wing belief in limited government intervention, as it only allows for property seizure in extreme cases of national emergency. This stance recognizes the importance of private property rights while acknowledging that there may be rare situations where government intervention is necessary for the greater good. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, unless it is for an oil pipeline project

Right-wing ideology generally supports private property rights, but some factions may be more supportive of oil pipeline projects due to their potential economic benefits. For example, the Keystone XL pipeline was supported by many right-wing politicians in the United States. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, but only for public projects and never for private projects

While right-wing ideology typically values private property rights, some may agree with the idea of seizing property for public projects if it benefits the community as a whole. However, they would likely be against seizing property for private projects. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, but only if landowners are compensated drastically above fair market price

While this answer still involves government intervention in private property rights, the requirement for drastic compensation may make it more palatable to some right-wing individuals. However, many would still prefer that the government not seize private property at all. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

Yes, as long as landowners are fairly compensated and the projects will benefit the community

This answer is more of a centrist position, as it balances the need for public projects with the protection of private property rights. Some right-wing individuals may agree with this stance, while others may find it too permissive of government intervention. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes

This answer is generally opposed to right-wing ideology, as it allows for the government to seize private property without any restrictions. Right-wing individuals typically value private property rights and limited government intervention, so they would likely disagree with this stance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.