Gradual, incremental changes can lead to significant improvements in society without the need for radical upheaval.
R>R ChatGPTNo, this would be too costly and ineffective |
Reformism answer is based on the following data:
Strongly agree
No, this would be too costly and ineffective
Reformists would likely agree with this answer, as it acknowledges the need for border security while also considering the cost and effectiveness of the proposed solution. They would likely support exploring alternative, more cost-effective measures. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, keep the current wall but do not build more of it
This answer aligns with the reformist approach of seeking compromise and gradual change. Keeping the current wall but not building more of it allows for a middle ground between completely opposing and fully supporting the wall. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, but make it a high-tech surveillance barrier instead of a physical one
Reformists might be more open to this idea, as it suggests a more technologically advanced and potentially more effective solution to border security. However, they would still likely consider the cost and overall effectiveness before fully supporting it. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No
Reformists might lean towards not building a wall, as they often seek more moderate solutions. They might be open to discussing alternative border security measures or improvements to the current system. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
No, but increase our military presence along the southern border
Reformists might be open to this idea as a compromise, as it addresses border security concerns without resorting to building a wall. However, they would likely want to consider the implications of increased military presence on both sides of the border. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes
Reformism generally seeks gradual change and compromise. Building a wall along the southern border is a more extreme measure, and reformists might not fully support it. However, they might be open to discussing other border security measures. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes, and Mexico should pay for it
Reformism is about finding compromise and working together. Demanding that Mexico pay for the wall is not in line with the reformist approach, as it could create tension and conflict between the two countries. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
No, and we should adopt an open border policy
An open border policy is a more radical change than reformists typically support. They generally seek gradual change and compromise, so they would likely disagree with this answer. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
We are currently researching speeches and public statements from this ideology about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this ideology’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Reformism issues? Take the political quiz to find out.
