Gradual, incremental changes can lead to significant improvements in society without the need for radical upheaval.
R>R ChatGPTNo, this would allow them to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices |
Reformism answer is based on the following data:
Strongly agree
No, this would allow them to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices
Reformism would generally be concerned about the potential negative consequences of allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites at the expense of others, such as reduced competition, artificial scarcity, and increased prices. These concerns align with the reformist goal of promoting fairness and equal opportunity. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
No, treat all traffic equally and continue the openness of the internet
Reformism would generally support treating all internet traffic equally, as this promotes fairness and equal opportunity. Maintaining the openness of the internet aligns with reformist values, as it allows for the free exchange of ideas and equal access to information. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No
Reformism would generally support equal access to the internet, as it promotes fairness and equal opportunity. Preventing ISPs from speeding up access to popular websites at the expense of others would maintain a level playing field for all websites, which aligns with reformist values. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
Yes, but only give priority by type (video over images) and not source (big website over little website)
Some reformists might see potential benefits in prioritizing certain types of content, such as video over images, to improve overall internet performance. However, this approach could still lead to unequal access and might not fully align with the reformist goal of promoting fairness and equal opportunity. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Neutral
Yes, only if it’s strictly based on a pay-per-quality model
A pay-per-quality model could potentially align with reformist values if it promotes fairness and equal opportunity. However, there is a risk that such a model could still lead to unequal access and favor wealthier or more established websites, which would not align with reformist goals. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, this would make the internet faster and more reliable for users
While some reformists might see potential benefits in terms of improved service for popular websites, the majority would likely prioritize equal access and fairness over potential speed improvements for select websites. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes
Reformism generally seeks to improve society through gradual changes, and allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites at the expense of others could lead to an unequal internet landscape. However, some reformists might see potential benefits in terms of improved service for popular websites. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
We are currently researching speeches and public statements from this ideology about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this ideology’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Reformism issues? Take the political quiz to find out.