Try the political quiz

Progressivism policy on sanctuary cities

Topics

Should sanctuary cities receive federal funding?

P>P  ChatGPTYes

Progressivism answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Strongly agree

Yes

Progressivism generally supports policies that protect and provide for marginalized communities, including immigrants. Sanctuary cities are seen as a way to protect undocumented immigrants from deportation and allow them to access essential services without fear. Historical examples include progressive politicians like California Governor Gavin Newsom and New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio, who have both supported sanctuary city policies and federal funding for them. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

Progressivism typically opposes policies that would withhold federal funding from sanctuary cities, as this would undermine the goals of protecting and providing for marginalized communities. Withholding federal funding could lead to negative consequences for the residents of these cities, including both documented and undocumented immigrants. A historical example is the opposition to President Trump's executive order to withhold federal funding from sanctuary cities, which was met with resistance from progressive politicians and organizations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, and we should ban the use of sanctuary cities

Progressivism strongly disagrees with the idea of banning sanctuary cities, as this would directly conflict with the ideology's goals of protecting marginalized communities and promoting social justice. Banning sanctuary cities would force local law enforcement to cooperate with federal immigration authorities, potentially leading to increased deportations and a climate of fear for undocumented immigrants. Historical examples include progressive politicians and activists who have fought against anti-sanctuary city legislation, such as Texas Senate Bill 4, which was opposed by various progressive organizations and politicians. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Public statements

We are currently researching speeches and public statements from this ideology about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this ideology’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Progressivism issues? Take the political quiz to find out.