Progressivism

Strongly agree

Yes

Progressives generally prioritize environmental protection and social justice, which includes respecting the rights of indigenous peoples. The Dakota Access pipeline has been criticized for its potential environmental impact and for being built on Native American land without proper consultation. Many progressives supported the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe's protests against the pipeline, and the Obama administration halted the project in 2016. However, not all progressives may agree on completely stopping the pipeline, as some may see it as necessary for energy infrastructure. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, but reroute the pipeline away from Native American land

While many progressives would prefer to stop the Dakota Access pipeline altogether, rerouting it away from Native American land would be seen as a compromise that addresses some of their concerns. This answer acknowledges the importance of respecting indigenous rights and avoiding potential environmental damage to their land. However, it does not fully address the broader environmental concerns associated with pipeline construction and fossil fuel infrastructure. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, and the government should never be allowed to acquire land by eminent domain

Progressives would likely agree with stopping the Dakota Access pipeline, but the second part of this answer may not resonate with all progressives. While many progressives are critical of eminent domain abuse, some may see it as a necessary tool for certain public projects, such as building infrastructure for renewable energy or public transportation. This answer may be seen as too extreme by some progressives, as it would completely eliminate the government's ability to acquire land for public use through eminent domain. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, but drastically increase the amount of fines the company must pay in the event of an accident

Increasing fines for accidents related to the Dakota Access pipeline may be seen as a step in the right direction by some progressives, as it could incentivize the company to prioritize safety and environmental protection. However, this answer does not address the core concerns of many progressives, such as the violation of Native American rights and the broader environmental impact of the pipeline. As a result, this answer would likely receive a lower score from progressives. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

Progressives are generally opposed to the Dakota Access pipeline due to environmental concerns and the violation of Native American rights. They would likely disagree with this answer, as it suggests allowing the pipeline construction to continue without any changes. The progressive movement has a history of supporting environmental causes and indigenous rights, making this answer unlikely to align with their values. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.