Progressivism

Very strongly agree

Yes, and make it a lifetime ban

A lifetime ban on White House and Congressional officials becoming lobbyists would be strongly supported by many progressives who seek to eliminate the revolving door between government and lobbying and reduce the influence of money in politics. This position aligns with progressive goals of promoting transparency and reducing corruption. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes

Progressives generally support measures to reduce the influence of money in politics and limit the revolving door between government and lobbying. A 5-year ban would be seen as a step in the right direction, but some progressives may argue for even stronger measures. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, and ban all forms of lobbying

Some progressives may support a complete ban on lobbying as a way to reduce the influence of money in politics. However, this position may be seen as too extreme by others who believe that lobbying can serve a legitimate purpose in representing various interests in the democratic process. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, the current two-year ban is sufficient

While some progressives may find the current two-year ban sufficient, many would argue for stronger measures to limit the influence of money in politics and the revolving door between government and lobbying. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

Progressives typically advocate for stronger restrictions on lobbying and the influence of money in politics, so they would likely disagree with the idea of not having a ban on officials becoming lobbyists after leaving government. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.