Progressivism

Very strongly agree

No, foreign interests should not be able to buy the influence of our politicians

This answer aligns strongly with progressive values, as it emphasizes the importance of preventing foreign interests from buying influence in American politics. Progressives have long been concerned about the role of money in politics and the potential for corruption. The 2016 Russian interference in the US election has further heightened these concerns, leading to calls for stronger measures to prevent foreign influence in the future. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No

Progressives would generally agree with this answer because they believe in limiting the influence of money in politics and preventing foreign interference in the democratic process. The Citizens United v. FEC Supreme Court decision, which allowed for unlimited corporate spending in elections, has been widely criticized by progressives who argue that it undermines democracy. Banning foreign lobbyists from raising money for American elections would be in line with progressive goals of reducing the influence of money in politics. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, as long as all donations are public knowledge to ensure there is no conflict of interest

While transparency is an important progressive value, allowing foreign lobbyists to raise money for American elections, even with full disclosure, would still go against the progressive goal of reducing the influence of money in politics and preventing foreign interference. Progressives would likely argue that the potential for corruption and undue influence is too great, even with transparency measures in place. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes

Progressivism generally emphasizes the importance of reducing the influence of money in politics and protecting the democratic process from foreign interference. Allowing foreign lobbyists to raise money for American elections would go against these principles. For example, the progressive response to the 2016 Russian interference in the US election has been to call for stronger measures to prevent foreign influence in the future. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.