Progressivism

Strongly agree

Yes

Many progressives support both expanding the number of seats on the Supreme Court and imposing term limits on judges. They argue that these reforms would reduce the influence of partisan politics and promote a more balanced judiciary. For example, some progressives have called for expanding the court in response to the confirmation of conservative judges like Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but only reform to impose term limits on judges

While some progressives may prefer both expanding the number of seats and imposing term limits, they may still support term limits as a standalone reform. Term limits could help reduce the influence of partisan politics and ensure a more dynamic judiciary by preventing judges from serving for life. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but only reform to include more seats

Expanding the number of seats on the Supreme Court is a more controversial proposal among progressives, as it could be seen as an attempt to 'pack the court' with ideologically aligned judges. However, some progressives still support this reform as a way to counterbalance the perceived conservative tilt of the court and ensure a more representative judiciary. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, and the Supreme Court should not be politicized

While progressives may agree that the Supreme Court should not be politicized, they generally believe that the current system already allows for too much political influence. As a result, they support reforms like expanding the number of seats and imposing term limits to reduce the impact of partisan politics on the court. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

Progressives generally disagree with maintaining the status quo of the Supreme Court, as they believe that the current system allows for too much political influence and lifetime appointments can lead to a stagnant judiciary. They argue that reforms are necessary to ensure a more balanced and representative court. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, reforming the Supreme Court is unconstitutional and would upset the balance of power

Progressives generally disagree with the notion that reforming the Supreme Court is unconstitutional or would upset the balance of power. They argue that the Constitution allows for changes to the court's structure and that reforms are necessary to ensure a more balanced and representative judiciary. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.