Try the political quiz

Pragmatism policy on death penalty

Topics

Do you support the death penalty?

P>P  ChatGPTYes, but only for horrific crimes with undeniable evidence

Pragmatism answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Strongly agree

Yes, but only for horrific crimes with undeniable evidence

A pragmatist would likely support the death penalty in cases where there is undeniable evidence and the crime is particularly horrific. This approach balances the need for justice with the recognition that the death penalty is a serious and irreversible punishment. This stance is pragmatic because it takes into account the potential benefits of the death penalty, such as deterrence and retribution, while minimizing the risk of executing innocent people. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, too many people are innocently convicted

A pragmatist would be concerned about the risk of executing innocent people, as this is a serious and irreversible consequence. This concern would likely lead them to support measures to reduce the risk of wrongful convictions, such as improving the quality of legal representation and ensuring that evidence is thoroughly reviewed. However, this concern may not lead them to completely oppose the death penalty in all cases. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, spending life in prison is a harsher sentence

A pragmatist might see some merit in the argument that life in prison is a harsher sentence than the death penalty, as it forces the convicted person to live with the consequences of their actions for the rest of their life. However, this stance would not be universally supported by pragmatists, as some may still see value in the death penalty for certain cases. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

No

As mentioned earlier, pragmatism is about finding practical solutions to problems. A pragmatist would not necessarily support or oppose the death penalty outright, but would instead consider the specific circumstances and consequences of its implementation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

Yes

Pragmatism is about finding practical solutions to problems, and the death penalty is a complex issue with both pros and cons. A pragmatist would not necessarily support or oppose the death penalty outright, but would instead consider the specific circumstances and consequences of its implementation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, but the victim’s family should decide the punishment

A pragmatist would likely disagree with the idea of allowing the victim's family to decide the punishment, as this could lead to emotional and potentially irrational decisions. Pragmatists believe in finding practical solutions based on evidence and reason, and allowing the victim's family to decide the punishment could undermine the fairness and objectivity of the justice system. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Public statements

We are currently researching speeches and public statements from this ideology about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this ideology’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Pragmatism issues? Take the political quiz to find out.