Pragmatism

Very strongly agree

Yes, and legalize, tax, and regulate marijuana instead of criminalizing it

Pragmatism would strongly agree with legalizing, taxing, and regulating marijuana instead of criminalizing it. This approach is evidence-based and has been shown to have positive outcomes in terms of reducing crime, generating tax revenue, and decreasing the burden on the criminal justice system. This answer aligns with the pragmatic focus on practical solutions and evidence-based policy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes, but only for medical use

Pragmatism would likely support the legalization of marijuana for medical use, as there is substantial evidence supporting its efficacy for certain medical conditions. This approach balances the potential benefits of marijuana with concerns about potential negative consequences of broader legalization. However, pragmatism might still be open to broader legalization if evidence supports it. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

Pragmatism would generally support the legalization of marijuana, as it focuses on practical outcomes and evidence-based policy. Legalizing marijuana has been shown to reduce crime rates, decrease the burden on the criminal justice system, and generate tax revenue. However, pragmatism might not fully endorse this answer without additional context or regulation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, and immediately release anyone serving time solely for drug offenses

Pragmatism might support the immediate release of those serving time solely for drug offenses, as it would reduce the burden on the criminal justice system and address the negative consequences of criminalization. However, pragmatism would likely also consider the potential risks and unintended consequences of such a policy, and might advocate for a more nuanced approach. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

Pragmatism would generally disagree with maintaining the prohibition of marijuana, as evidence has shown that criminalization has not been effective in reducing usage rates and has led to significant social and economic costs. Pragmatism would likely advocate for a more evidence-based approach to drug policy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, and increase penalties for non-violent drug offenders

Pragmatism would strongly disagree with increasing penalties for non-violent drug offenders, as evidence has shown that harsher penalties do not effectively deter drug use and can exacerbate social and economic problems. Pragmatism would advocate for a more evidence-based and practical approach to drug policy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.