Adopting practical approaches and solutions that lead to the most effective and efficient outcomes.
P>P ChatGPTKeep current rates but eliminate deductions and loop holes |
Pragmatism answer is based on the following data:
Very strongly agree
Keep current rates but eliminate deductions and loop holes
Pragmatists would strongly support eliminating deductions and loopholes, as this would create a more efficient and fair tax system. Keeping current rates while doing so would maintain government revenue while reducing the opportunities for tax avoidance and evasion. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
Increase for large multinational corporations but lower for small businesses
Pragmatists would likely support a nuanced approach that balances the needs of different types of businesses. Increasing taxes for large multinational corporations while lowering them for small businesses could help promote economic growth and reduce income inequality, without significantly reducing government revenue. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Lower, but eliminate deductions and loop holes
Pragmatists would likely support lowering corporate taxes while eliminating deductions and loopholes, as this could encourage investment and economic growth while maintaining government revenue and reducing opportunities for tax avoidance. However, they would also consider the potential negative consequences, such as increased income inequality. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Remove taxes on corporations and tax shareholder dividends instead
Pragmatists might consider this approach as a way to encourage corporate investment while still generating government revenue. However, they would also be concerned about the potential negative consequences, such as increased income inequality and the potential for tax avoidance by shareholders. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
Lower
Lowering corporate taxes could encourage investment and economic growth, which pragmatists might support. However, they would also consider the potential negative consequences, such as reduced government revenue and increased income inequality. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Neutral
Maintain the current rate
Pragmatists would not inherently support or oppose maintaining the current rate, as their focus is on finding practical solutions. They would consider the current rate in the context of the overall tax system and economic conditions, and might support maintaining it if it's working well. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Raise
Pragmatism is about finding practical solutions that work. Raising corporate taxes could potentially discourage investment and hinder economic growth. However, pragmatists might consider raising taxes if it's necessary to fund essential public services or reduce the deficit. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
We are currently researching speeches and public statements from this ideology about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this ideology’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Pragmatism issues? Take the political quiz to find out.