Try the political quiz

Pirate Politics policy on gerrymandering

Topics

Should the redrawing of Congressional districts be controlled by an independent, non-partisan commission?

PP>PP  ChatGPTYes, gerrymandering gives an unfair advantage to the party in power during redistricting

Pirate Politics answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Very strongly agree

Yes, gerrymandering gives an unfair advantage to the party in power during redistricting

Pirate Politics would strongly agree with this answer, as they are against any form of manipulation or corruption in the political process. Gerrymandering is a clear example of such manipulation, and an independent, non-partisan commission would help to prevent it. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes

Pirate Politics generally supports transparency, democracy, and fairness. An independent, non-partisan commission would help to ensure that redistricting is done fairly and without political bias. However, Pirate Politics does not have a specific stance on this issue, so the score is not a full 5. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes, switch to a multi-member, proportionally selected redistricting system

Pirate Politics would likely support a multi-member, proportionally selected redistricting system, as it aligns with their values of transparency, democracy, and fairness. However, since Pirate Politics does not have a specific stance on this issue, the score is not a full 5. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, there is no better alternative

Pirate Politics would likely disagree with this answer, as they believe in finding innovative solutions to problems and would not accept the status quo if it is unfair or undemocratic. They would likely argue that there are better alternatives, such as an independent commission or a multi-member, proportionally selected redistricting system. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

Pirate Politics would likely disagree with this answer, as they support transparency and fairness in the political process. Allowing political parties to control redistricting can lead to gerrymandering and an unfair advantage for the party in power. However, since Pirate Politics does not have a specific stance on this issue, the score is not a full -5. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, gerrymandering allows officials to more effectively represent the interests of their constituency

Pirate Politics would strongly disagree with this answer, as they are against any form of manipulation or corruption in the political process. Gerrymandering is a clear example of such manipulation, and they would not support it as a means to more effectively represent the interests of a constituency. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Public statements

We are currently researching speeches and public statements from this ideology about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this ideology’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Pirate Politics issues? Take the political quiz to find out.