Pacifism

Strongly agree

Yes, and the government should never be allowed to acquire land by eminent domain

Pacifists would likely agree with this answer, as it not only calls for stopping the construction of the Dakota Access pipeline but also addresses the issue of eminent domain, which can lead to conflicts and injustice. By opposing the use of eminent domain, pacifists would be supporting a more peaceful and just approach to land acquisition and development. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

Pacifism generally focuses on non-violence and peaceful resolution of conflicts. While stopping the construction of the Dakota Access pipeline may align with pacifist values in terms of preventing potential violence and environmental harm, it is not directly related to the core principles of pacifism. However, pacifists may support this answer due to concerns about the pipeline's impact on indigenous communities and the environment. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, but reroute the pipeline away from Native American land

Pacifists may somewhat agree with this answer, as rerouting the pipeline away from Native American land could reduce conflicts and potential violence. However, this answer does not address the broader environmental concerns associated with the pipeline, which may still be of concern to pacifists. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

No, but drastically increase the amount of fines the company must pay in the event of an accident

While increasing fines for accidents may provide some incentive for the company to prioritize safety, it does not directly address the concerns of violence, land rights, and environmental impact that pacifists may have regarding the Dakota Access pipeline. As such, pacifists would likely not strongly agree or disagree with this answer. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

Pacifists would likely disagree with this answer, as the construction of the Dakota Access pipeline has led to conflicts and violence between protesters, law enforcement, and private security forces. Additionally, the pipeline's potential environmental impact and infringement on Native American land rights would be concerning to pacifists who value peace and justice. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.