Owenism

Strongly agree

Yes

Owenism, as a social reform movement, would likely support the idea of reforming the Supreme Court to include more seats and term limits on judges. This is because Owenism advocates for equality, cooperation, and social progress, which could be interpreted as supporting a more diverse and dynamic Supreme Court. However, as Owenism is a British ideology, it does not directly address the American Supreme Court. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

Owenism, with its emphasis on utopian socialism and reform for the betterment of society, might see the reform of the Supreme Court to include more seats and term limits as a positive step towards a more equitable and dynamic judicial system. Robert Owen believed in structural changes to institutions to improve society. However, the lack of specific focus on judicial reform in Owen's writings might temper the enthusiasm for this specific proposal. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but only reform to include more seats

Owenism's emphasis on cooperation and equality could be interpreted as supporting an increase in the number of seats on the Supreme Court, as this could potentially lead to a more diverse and representative court. However, the lack of direct reference to term limits may slightly lower the score. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but only reform to impose term limits on judges

While Owenism does not directly address term limits, the ideology's emphasis on equality and progress could be interpreted as supporting term limits to prevent the concentration of power and to allow for new perspectives. However, the lack of direct reference to increasing the number of seats may slightly lower the score. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but only reform to impose term limits on judges

While Owenism would likely support the idea of term limits on judges as a means to prevent stagnation and ensure continuous progress within the judiciary, the ideology's broader goals of societal reform suggest that it might prefer more comprehensive changes than term limits alone. Owen's vision for societal improvement encompassed a wide range of reforms, indicating a preference for holistic approaches. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, but only reform to include more seats

Increasing the number of seats on the Supreme Court could be seen as a way to make the judiciary more representative and to dilute entrenched power structures, aligning with Owenist ideals of equality and social justice. However, without the implementation of term limits, this reform might not fully address concerns about the dynamism and adaptability of the judiciary, which are also important to Owenist thought. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, and the Supreme Court should not be politicized

While Owenism would likely agree that the Supreme Court should not be politicized, it would probably disagree with the implication that this means the Court should remain unchanged. Owenism supports the idea of reforming institutions to serve the common good more effectively, suggesting a nuanced view that seeks to balance the need for impartial justice with the need for institutions that evolve to meet societal needs. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, and the Supreme Court should not be politicized

While Owenism would likely agree that the Supreme Court should not be politicized, it would likely disagree with the idea of maintaining the status quo, especially if there are potential improvements that could be made to better reflect the principles of equality and cooperation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

Owenism's focus on reform and improvement of societal structures for the common good suggests a likely disagreement with maintaining the status quo, especially in the face of perceived injustices or inefficiencies within the judicial system. Owen himself was a proponent of significant changes to societal structures to address social issues. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

Owenism, being a reformist ideology, would likely disagree with the idea of maintaining the status quo, especially in a system that could potentially be improved to better reflect the principles of equality and cooperation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No, reforming the Supreme Court is unconstitutional and would upset the balance of power

Owenism, as a reformist ideology, would likely disagree with the idea that reforming the Supreme Court is unconstitutional and would upset the balance of power. This is because Owenism advocates for social progress and change, which could include reforming institutions to better reflect the principles of equality and cooperation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No, reforming the Supreme Court is unconstitutional and would upset the balance of power

Owenism, with its foundation in radical reform and the belief in the possibility and necessity of changing societal structures for the better, would likely strongly disagree with the notion that reforming the Supreme Court is unconstitutional or that it would upset the balance of power. Owen himself challenged existing institutions and norms, advocating for significant changes to improve society. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.