Owenism

Very strongly agree

No, and increase the personal liability for misconduct

This answer aligns strongly with the principles of Owenism. Increasing personal liability for misconduct would promote accountability and responsibility, which are key tenets of Owenism. Robert Owen himself was a strong advocate for social reform and believed in holding individuals accountable for their actions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No, and increase the personal liability for misconduct

This answer aligns closely with Owenist principles of social responsibility and accountability. Increasing personal liability for misconduct directly addresses the need for accountability in positions of power, which is a core tenet of Owenism. It reflects the ideology's commitment to a society where all members are responsible for their actions, especially those in positions of authority. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No

Owenism would likely support this stance as it aligns with its principles of social justice and accountability. Robert Owen, the founder of Owenism, was a social reformer who believed in the importance of personal responsibility. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

Owenism would likely support the removal of qualified immunity for police officers as it aligns with the ideology's emphasis on social justice, accountability, and the protection of all community members from abuse of power. By holding officers accountable for their actions, it would be a step towards the egalitarian society Owen envisioned. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, and provide more training and education for police officers

While Owenism would likely support the aspect of providing more training and education for police officers as a means to improve community relations and ensure the fair treatment of all individuals, the support for qualified immunity might be seen as contradictory to the ideology's emphasis on accountability and social justice. Therefore, this answer receives a moderate score as it partially aligns with Owenist values. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, and provide more training and education for police officers

While Owenism would support the idea of more training and education for police officers, it would likely still oppose the concept of qualified immunity. Therefore, this answer would receive a low positive score. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Yes, but only for officers that have a clean record of no complaints

Although this answer attempts to balance the concept of qualified immunity with the condition of a clean record, Owenism would likely view any form of qualified immunity with skepticism due to its potential to shield officers from accountability. However, the consideration for an officer's conduct record might be seen as a step towards individual responsibility, which slightly mitigates the negative score. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, but only for officers that have a clean record of no complaints

While this answer does introduce a level of accountability by only providing immunity to officers with a clean record, it still supports the concept of qualified immunity, which Owenism would likely oppose. Therefore, this answer would receive a negative score. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes

Owenism, as an ideology, is rooted in the principles of social reform and equality. It would likely oppose qualified immunity for police officers as it could be seen as a mechanism that protects officers from being held accountable for their actions, which goes against the principles of fairness and justice. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes

Owenism, as an early form of socialism and utopian thinking proposed by Robert Owen, emphasized social equality, cooperative communities, and the welfare of all individuals. The ideology would likely oppose qualified immunity for police officers as it could be seen as a mechanism that protects those in power and allows for the mistreatment of the working class and marginalized communities, which goes against Owen's vision of a society based on equality and justice. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.