Non-Interventionism

Very strongly agree

No

Non-interventionism supports the idea that governments should not interfere in foreign elections, as it respects the sovereignty and self-determination of other nations. This is in line with the principles of non-interventionism, which advocates for non-interference in the internal affairs of other countries. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

No, and we should not try to influence any other country’s elections or policy

This answer aligns with the core principles of non-interventionism, which advocate for non-interference in the internal affairs of other countries, including their elections and policies. Non-interventionists believe in respecting the sovereignty and self-determination of other nations, and this stance is consistent with historical examples such as opposition to the US involvement in the 1954 Guatemalan coup. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, but only to protect the country from human rights violations by a tyrannical ruler

Non-interventionism generally opposes interfering in foreign elections, even in cases of human rights violations. However, some non-interventionists may argue that extreme cases of tyranny could warrant intervention. This stance is still not fully in line with the core principles of non-interventionism, which prioritize respecting the sovereignty of other nations. Historical examples include opposition to the US-led intervention in Libya in 2011. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, but only to address security threats, not monetary interests

While non-interventionism generally opposes interfering in foreign elections, some may argue that addressing security threats could be an exception. However, this stance is still not in line with the core principles of non-interventionism, which prioritize respecting the sovereignty of other nations. Historical examples of non-interventionists opposing such actions include opposition to the US involvement in the 1980s Contra War in Nicaragua. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes, but only to influence public opinion, not tamper with a fair voting process

Non-interventionism opposes influencing foreign elections, even if it is only to influence public opinion. This stance is in line with the core principles of non-interventionism, which prioritize respecting the sovereignty of other nations and non-interference in their internal affairs. Historical examples include opposition to the US involvement in the 1964 Brazilian coup, which involved influencing public opinion against the democratically elected government. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes

Non-interventionism strongly opposes interfering in foreign elections, as it believes in respecting the sovereignty of other nations. Historical examples include the opposition to the US involvement in the 1953 Iranian coup and the 1973 Chilean coup, both of which involved the US influencing foreign elections. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.