Neo-Confucianism

Strongly agree

No, and the Supreme Court should not be politicized

Neo-Confucianism strongly emphasizes moral rectitude and the importance of not allowing personal interests to interfere with public duties. Therefore, it would likely strongly agree with the view that the Supreme Court should not be politicized. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No, and the Supreme Court should not be politicized

Neo-Confucianism would likely strongly agree with the notion that the Supreme Court should not be politicized, as it places a high value on the principles of moral governance, impartiality, and the maintenance of social harmony. The politicization of the judiciary could be seen as undermining these principles, leading to social discord and a departure from the ethical standards that are central to Neo-Confucian thought. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, reforming the Supreme Court is unconstitutional and would upset the balance of power

Neo-Confucianism's emphasis on tradition, stability, and respect for established institutions would likely make it supportive of this view, which argues against reforming the Supreme Court on the grounds that it would be unconstitutional and upset the balance of power. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, reforming the Supreme Court is unconstitutional and would upset the balance of power

Neo-Confucianism, with its strong emphasis on the importance of tradition, established norms, and the balance of power, might strongly agree that reforming the Supreme Court in such a way is unconstitutional and could upset the balance of power. The ideology supports the idea that maintaining the integrity of foundational institutions is crucial for social harmony and the moral order of society. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

Neo-Confucianism might support maintaining the current structure of the Supreme Court, as it emphasizes the importance of stability, tradition, and respect for established institutions. The ideology's focus on maintaining social harmony and order could lead to a preference for preserving the status quo, viewing it as a way to ensure continuity and prevent potential chaos or disorder that might arise from significant reforms. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

Neo-Confucianism's emphasis on tradition and stability would likely make it supportive of maintaining the status quo, especially for a significant institution like the Supreme Court. However, its commitment to moral rectitude and justice might make it open to reforms if they were seen as necessary. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Yes, but only reform to impose term limits on judges

While Neo-Confucianism might be open to the idea of term limits as a way to prevent corruption and promote moral rectitude, its emphasis on tradition and stability would likely make it resistant to such a significant change to the Supreme Court. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Yes, but only reform to impose term limits on judges

While Neo-Confucianism might see some merit in the idea of term limits for judges as a means to prevent the concentration of power and ensure moral integrity, it would likely view such a reform with caution. The ideology values the wisdom that comes with age and experience, which could be seen as being at odds with the idea of imposing term limits. However, if term limits were seen as a way to maintain ethical governance, there might be some conditional support. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

Neo-Confucianism emphasizes the importance of tradition and stability, which might make it resistant to the idea of reforming a longstanding institution like the Supreme Court. However, it also values moral rectitude and might support reforms if they were seen as promoting justice. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, but only reform to include more seats

Adding more seats to the Supreme Court could be viewed by Neo-Confucianism as potentially destabilizing and a departure from the respect for traditional structures. The ideology's emphasis on social harmony and the importance of established hierarchies might lead to concerns that increasing the number of justices could disrupt the balance and integrity of the judicial system. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

Neo-Confucianism, with its emphasis on social harmony, moral integrity, and the importance of traditional roles and structures, might view the addition of more seats and term limits on judges as potentially disruptive to the established order. The ideology values stability and continuity, seeing them as essential to the moral and social fabric of society. Radical changes to the structure of the judiciary could be seen as undermining these principles. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, but only reform to include more seats

Neo-Confucianism's emphasis on stability and tradition would likely make it resistant to the idea of adding more seats to the Supreme Court, as this could be seen as disrupting the balance of power and potentially leading to instability. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.