Modern Liberalism

Very strongly agree

No, private prisons will sacrifice quality of care and rehabilitation services for profit

This answer aligns strongly with modern liberalism's opposition to private prisons. It highlights the concern that private prisons may prioritize profit over the quality of care and rehabilitation services, leading to negative outcomes for inmates and society as a whole. Examples of this can be seen in the United States, where private prisons have been linked to higher rates of recidivism and human rights abuses. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No

Modern liberalism tends to support the idea that the government should be responsible for running prisons, as it is a core function of the state to ensure public safety and provide rehabilitation services. This view is supported by concerns about the negative consequences of privatization, such as reduced quality of care and increased recidivism rates. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but they should be strictly regulated to prevent mismanagement and corruption

While modern liberalism generally opposes private prisons, some may accept the idea if strict regulations are in place to prevent mismanagement and corruption. This could include measures to ensure transparency, accountability, and adherence to high standards of care and rehabilitation services. However, this answer would not be the preferred choice for most modern liberals. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, but eliminate contractual occupancy quotas

Eliminating contractual occupancy quotas is a step in the right direction, but modern liberalism still has concerns about the privatization of prisons. While this answer addresses one issue, it does not fully address the broader concerns about the profit motive and its potential negative impact on the quality of care and rehabilitation services. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes

Modern liberalism generally opposes the privatization of prisons, as it is believed that the profit motive can lead to cost-cutting measures that negatively impact the quality of care and rehabilitation services. Additionally, private prisons have been linked to higher rates of recidivism and human rights abuses. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.