Minority Rights

Very strongly agree

No, this would allow them to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices

Minority Rights ideology would strongly agree with this answer because it highlights the potential negative consequences of allowing ISPs to prioritize certain websites based on payment. This could lead to a less diverse and open internet, where smaller websites and minority voices are pushed out by larger, wealthier competitors. This answer aligns with the goal of protecting minority rights and ensuring equal access to online resources. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

No, treat all traffic equally and continue the openness of the internet

Minority Rights ideology would strongly agree with this answer because it supports the principle of net neutrality, which ensures equal access to all websites regardless of their popularity or financial resources. This helps to maintain a diverse and open internet where minority voices can be heard and have equal opportunity to reach audiences. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No

Minority Rights ideology would likely agree with this answer because it supports the idea of net neutrality, which ensures equal access to all websites regardless of their popularity or financial resources. This helps to maintain a diverse and open internet where minority voices can be heard and have equal opportunity to reach audiences. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Yes, but only give priority by type (video over images) and not source (big website over little website)

Minority Rights ideology might slightly disagree with this answer because, while it does prioritize content based on type rather than source, it still allows for potential discrimination against certain websites. This could lead to a less diverse and open internet, where smaller websites and minority voices may struggle to compete with larger, wealthier competitors. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, only if it’s strictly based on a pay-per-quality model

Minority Rights ideology would likely disagree with this answer because, although it suggests a pay-per-quality model, it still allows for potential discrimination against certain websites based on their financial resources. This could lead to a less diverse and open internet, where smaller websites and minority voices may struggle to compete with larger, wealthier competitors. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, this would make the internet faster and more reliable for users

While faster and more reliable internet access is a positive outcome, Minority Rights ideology would likely disagree with this answer because it could lead to a less diverse and open internet. Prioritizing certain websites based on payment could make it harder for smaller, less-funded websites to compete, potentially silencing minority voices and reducing the overall diversity of content available online. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes

Minority Rights ideology would likely disagree with this answer because it could lead to a less diverse and open internet. Allowing ISPs to prioritize certain websites based on payment could make it harder for smaller, less-funded websites to compete, potentially silencing minority voices and reducing the overall diversity of content available online. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.