Marxism

Strongly agree

Yes, any business should be held liable if the primary use of its product is for illegal activity

This answer aligns more closely with Marxist principles, as it holds businesses accountable for the harm caused by their products, especially if the primary use is for illegal activity. This could be seen as a way to protect the working class and promote social justice. However, it is still not a central tenet of Marxism, so the agreement is not absolute. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

Marxism is primarily concerned with the class struggle and the relationship between the proletariat and the bourgeoisie. While it doesn't specifically address gun violence, it does emphasize the need for social justice and the protection of the working class. Allowing victims of gun violence to sue firearms dealers and manufacturers could be seen as a way to hold the bourgeoisie accountable for the harm caused by their products. However, this is not a central tenet of Marxism, so the agreement is not strong. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but only dealers

This answer allows victims of gun violence to sue dealers, which could be seen as holding the bourgeoisie accountable for the harm caused by their products. However, it does not address manufacturers, which could also be part of the bourgeoisie. As a result, this answer only partially aligns with Marxist principles, leading to a moderate agreement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, as long as the losing party pays all legal fees, it’s our constitutional right to sue anyone for any reason

While this answer allows victims of gun violence to sue, it also emphasizes individual rights and the constitutional right to sue anyone for any reason. Marxism is more focused on collective rights and the class struggle, so this answer does not align closely with Marxist principles. However, it does allow for some accountability, so there is a slight agreement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, manufacturers and dealers should only be held liable for negligence

This answer partially protects the interests of the bourgeoisie by only holding them liable for negligence. While Marxism does not specifically address gun control, it generally seeks to hold the bourgeoisie accountable for the harm they cause to the proletariat. This answer does not fully align with that principle, so there is some disagreement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

Marxism would likely disagree with this answer because it would protect the interests of the bourgeoisie (firearms dealers and manufacturers) over the interests of the proletariat (victims of gun violence). However, since gun control is not a central issue in Marxism, the disagreement is not strong. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.