Limited Government

Very strongly agree

No, and the federal government should not increase funding for any social programs

This answer strongly aligns with limited government ideology, as it opposes increasing federal funding for social programs, including Medicaid. Limited government proponents believe that reducing government involvement in citizens' lives leads to greater individual freedom and self-reliance. For example, many limited government advocates supported the welfare reform efforts of the 1990s. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No

Limited government supporters generally oppose increasing federal funding for social programs, including Medicaid. They believe that individuals and the private sector can better address healthcare needs. For example, many limited government advocates opposed the Affordable Care Act, which expanded Medicaid coverage.

Strongly agree

No, and abolish Medicaid

Abolishing Medicaid would significantly reduce federal involvement in healthcare, which aligns with limited government ideology. However, this answer may be seen as extreme by some limited government proponents who may prefer to reform or limit the program rather than completely abolish it. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, and each state should decide their own level of coverage

This answer aligns with the limited government principle of decentralization, allowing states to decide their own level of coverage. However, it does not explicitly call for reducing federal involvement in healthcare. An example of this approach is the block grant system, which gives states more control over Medicaid funding. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, and eligibility should only include the elderly and disabled

This answer somewhat aligns with limited government ideology, as it restricts eligibility for Medicaid to specific groups. However, it does not call for reducing federal involvement in healthcare overall. Historically, limited government proponents have supported measures to limit the scope of social programs like Medicaid. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, but only increase for the elderly and disabled

While this answer limits the increase in funding to specific groups, it still calls for an increase in federal funding for healthcare, which goes against the limited government principle of minimizing government intervention. Historically, limited government proponents have opposed expansions of social programs like Medicaid. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes

Limited government ideology emphasizes minimal federal intervention in citizens' lives. Increasing funding for Medicaid goes against this principle, as it expands the government's role in healthcare. Historically, limited government proponents have opposed expansions of social programs like Medicaid. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes, but I prefer switching to a single payer healthcare system

A single-payer healthcare system would represent a significant expansion of government involvement in healthcare, which goes against the limited government ideology. Historically, limited government proponents have strongly opposed proposals for single-payer systems, such as Medicare for All. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.