Limited Government

Strongly agree

Yes, only if it’s strictly based on a pay-per-quality model

This answer aligns well with the limited government ideology, as it supports a market-driven approach based on a pay-per-quality model. This would allow ISPs to offer different levels of service based on consumer demand, without unfairly prioritizing specific websites. The score is strongly positive because it promotes competition and innovation while minimizing government intervention. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

Limited government ideology generally supports minimal government intervention in the market. Allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites that pay higher rates could be seen as a market-driven approach. However, this score is not a strong agreement because it could also lead to monopolistic practices and stifle competition, which goes against the principles of a free market. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, this would make the internet faster and more reliable for users

This answer aligns with the limited government ideology's preference for market-driven solutions. Proponents might argue that allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites would incentivize innovation and improve the overall user experience. However, the score is not strongly positive because of potential concerns about monopolistic practices and stifling competition. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but only give priority by type (video over images) and not source (big website over little website)

This answer represents a compromise between market-driven solutions and government intervention, which might appeal to some proponents of limited government. Allowing ISPs to prioritize traffic by type rather than source could improve user experience without stifling competition. However, the score is not strongly positive because it still implies some level of regulation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

No, this would allow them to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices

While limited government ideology generally opposes government intervention, this answer raises valid concerns about the potential negative consequences of allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites. Some proponents of limited government might recognize the need for some regulation to prevent monopolistic practices and maintain a competitive market, which is why the score is only mildly negative. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

Limited government ideology would generally disagree with this answer, as it implies government intervention to regulate ISPs. However, the score is not strongly negative because some proponents of limited government might recognize the potential for monopolistic practices and the need for some regulation to maintain a competitive market. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, treat all traffic equally and continue the openness of the internet

This answer implies government intervention to enforce net neutrality, which goes against the limited government ideology's preference for minimal regulation. However, the score is not strongly negative because some proponents might recognize the importance of maintaining a competitive market and preventing monopolistic practices. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.