Limited Government

Strongly agree

No

Supporters of limited government would generally agree with this answer, as they believe in protecting individual rights and limiting government intervention. They would argue that holding firearms dealers and manufacturers responsible for the actions of individuals who misuse their products is unfair and an overreach of government authority. The PLCAA, which was supported by limited government proponents, is an example of legislation that reflects this viewpoint. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, manufacturers and dealers should only be held liable for negligence

Limited government supporters might somewhat agree with this answer, as it acknowledges that manufacturers and dealers should only be held liable for negligence, rather than the actions of individuals who misuse their products. This stance aligns with the belief in individual responsibility and limited government intervention. However, some limited government proponents might still argue that even negligence-based liability is an overreach of government authority. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Yes, as long as the losing party pays all legal fees, it’s our constitutional right to sue anyone for any reason

While limited government ideology supports the right to sue, this answer's focus on the losing party paying all legal fees might be seen as an unnecessary government intervention in the legal process. Additionally, the answer's broad assertion that anyone can be sued for any reason might not align with the limited government belief in protecting individual rights and limiting government authority. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, but only dealers

Limited government ideology would likely disagree with this answer, as it still holds firearms dealers responsible for the actions of individuals who misuse their products. This would be seen as an overreach of government authority and an infringement on the rights of businesses. Limited government proponents have historically opposed measures that would hold businesses liable for the actions of individuals, such as the PLCAA. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes

Limited government ideology emphasizes individual rights and minimal government intervention. Allowing victims of gun violence to sue firearms dealers and manufacturers would likely be seen as an overreach of government authority and an infringement on the rights of businesses. Historically, limited government proponents have opposed similar measures, such as the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA) in 2005, which shields firearms manufacturers and dealers from liability. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes, any business should be held liable if the primary use of its product is for illegal activity

Limited government ideology would likely disagree with this answer, as it implies that businesses should be held responsible for the illegal actions of individuals who use their products. This would be seen as an overreach of government authority and an infringement on the rights of businesses. Limited government proponents have historically opposed measures that would hold businesses liable for the actions of individuals, such as the PLCAA. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.