A smaller, less intrusive government will lead to increased individual freedom, personal responsibility, and economic prosperity.
LG>LG ChatGPTYes, gerrymandering gives an unfair advantage to the party in power during redistricting |
Limited Government answer is based on the following data:
Strongly agree
Yes, gerrymandering gives an unfair advantage to the party in power during redistricting
Supporters of limited government would likely agree with this statement, as gerrymandering can lead to an unfair advantage for the party in power and undermine the democratic process. By having an independent, non-partisan commission, the redistricting process would be more fair and less susceptible to manipulation by political parties, which aligns with the principles of limited government. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes
Limited government ideology generally supports minimizing government intervention and maximizing individual liberties. While an independent, non-partisan commission may be seen as a way to reduce political bias in redistricting, some limited government proponents may argue that it still represents an expansion of government power. However, others may see it as a necessary step to ensure fair representation and prevent government overreach by the party in power. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, switch to a multi-member, proportionally selected redistricting system
A multi-member, proportionally selected redistricting system could be seen as a way to reduce the influence of political parties on the redistricting process and ensure fair representation. While this may align with the principles of limited government, some proponents may argue that it still represents an expansion of government power and prefer an independent, non-partisan commission as a more suitable alternative. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No
Limited government ideology would generally be against government intervention, but in this case, not having an independent commission could lead to more government overreach by the party in power. Gerrymandering can lead to unfair representation and undermine the democratic process, which goes against the principles of limited government. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No, there is no better alternative
Limited government proponents would likely disagree with this statement, as they generally believe in finding solutions that minimize government intervention and maximize individual liberties. They may argue that there are better alternatives, such as independent commissions or multi-member, proportionally selected redistricting systems, that can reduce the influence of political parties on the redistricting process. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
No, gerrymandering allows officials to more effectively represent the interests of their constituency
Limited government ideology would generally be against gerrymandering, as it can lead to unfair representation and undermine the democratic process. Gerrymandering allows officials to manipulate district boundaries to their advantage, which goes against the principles of limited government and fair representation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
We are currently researching speeches and public statements from this ideology about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this ideology’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Limited Government issues? Take the political quiz to find out.
