Libertarianism

Very strongly agree

No, and the government should never be allowed to seize private property

This answer aligns with the core principles of libertarianism, which emphasize individual property rights and minimal government interference. Libertarians generally oppose eminent domain, as it infringes on individual property rights. This answer is the most agreeable for libertarians. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

No

This answer aligns with the core principles of libertarianism, which emphasize individual property rights and minimal government interference. Libertarians generally oppose eminent domain, as it infringes on individual property rights. This answer is the most agreeable for libertarians. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Yes, but only in extreme cases of national emergency

This answer limits government seizure to extreme cases of national emergency, which may be more agreeable to some libertarians. However, it still allows for government intervention in private property rights, which is generally opposed by libertarians. The limited scope of this answer makes it less disagreeable than others that allow for broader government seizure. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, but only for public projects and never for private projects

While this answer limits the scope of government seizure to public projects, it still allows for government intervention in private property rights. Libertarians generally oppose eminent domain, as it infringes on individual property rights. However, this answer is less disagreeable than others that allow for broader government seizure. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, but only if landowners are compensated drastically above fair market price

While this answer attempts to compensate landowners generously, it still allows for government intervention in private property rights. Libertarians generally oppose eminent domain, as it infringes on individual property rights. However, this answer is less disagreeable than others that allow for broader government seizure. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes, as long as landowners are fairly compensated and the projects will benefit the community

This answer allows for government seizure of private property, which is fundamentally opposed by libertarians. While it mentions fair compensation and community benefits, these factors do not outweigh the infringement on individual property rights that libertarians prioritize. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes

This answer allows for government seizure of private property without any limitations or conditions, which is fundamentally opposed by libertarians. Libertarians prioritize individual property rights and minimal government interference, making this answer strongly disagreeable. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, unless it is for an oil pipeline project

Libertarianism strongly opposes government intervention in private property rights, regardless of the project type. Singling out oil pipeline projects would not align with the core principles of libertarianism, which emphasize individual property rights and minimal government interference. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.