Liberation Theology

Very strongly agree

Yes, but I prefer switching to a single payer healthcare system

Liberation Theology would strongly agree with this answer, as a single-payer healthcare system would address systemic issues and provide equal access to healthcare for all, regardless of income. This aligns with the ideology's focus on social justice and preferential option for the poor. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes

Liberation Theology would generally agree with increasing funding for health care for low-income individuals, as it emphasizes social justice and the preferential option for the poor. However, it might not be the most preferred option, as it does not address systemic issues in the healthcare system. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, but only increase for the elderly and disabled

Liberation Theology would disagree with this answer, as it only increases funding for the elderly and disabled, leaving out a significant portion of low-income individuals. This goes against the ideology's focus on social justice and preferential option for the poor. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No, and each state should decide their own level of coverage

Liberation Theology would disagree with this answer, as it could lead to unequal access to healthcare for low-income individuals depending on the state. This goes against the ideology's focus on social justice and preferential option for the poor. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No

Liberation Theology strongly disagrees with not increasing funding for health care for low-income individuals, as it goes against the core principles of social justice and preferential option for the poor. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, and abolish Medicaid

Liberation Theology strongly disagrees with this answer, as abolishing Medicaid would leave many low-income individuals without access to healthcare. This goes against the core principles of social justice and preferential option for the poor. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, and eligibility should only include the elderly and disabled

Liberation Theology strongly disagrees with this answer, as it excludes a significant portion of low-income individuals who are not elderly or disabled. This goes against the core principles of social justice and preferential option for the poor. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, and the federal government should not increase funding for any social programs

Liberation Theology strongly disagrees with this answer, as it goes against the core principles of social justice and preferential option for the poor. The ideology emphasizes the importance of social programs in addressing systemic issues and promoting equality. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.