Liberal Conservatism

Strongly agree

No, the U.S. should encourage Iran to disarm through diplomatic channels

Liberal conservatism strongly supports diplomacy and peaceful resolutions to conflicts. Encouraging Iran to disarm through diplomatic channels aligns with this ideology. Historical examples include the Iran Nuclear Deal, which aimed to prevent Iran from developing nuclear weapons through diplomacy and economic incentives. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

Liberal conservatism tends to prioritize diplomacy and peaceful resolutions over military action. While they may not be completely opposed to military action, they would prefer to avoid war if possible. For example, the Iran Nuclear Deal, which was supported by some liberal conservatives, aimed to prevent Iran from developing nuclear weapons through diplomacy rather than war. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but only if they develop nuclear weapons

Liberal conservatism would be more likely to support military action if Iran were to develop nuclear weapons, as this would pose a significant threat to national security. However, they would still prefer diplomatic efforts to prevent this from happening in the first place, such as the Iran Nuclear Deal. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, but only with missile strikes

Liberal conservatism may support limited military action, such as missile strikes, if it is deemed necessary to protect national security and if diplomatic efforts have failed. However, this would not be their first choice, and they would still prefer diplomatic solutions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

Liberal conservatism generally prefers diplomatic solutions and limited intervention. Going to war with Iran without any conditions would not align with this ideology. However, liberal conservatives may support military action if diplomacy fails and there is a significant threat to national security. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.