Liberal Conservatism

Strongly agree

Yes, but not for cosmetics

Liberal conservatism would likely agree with allowing animal testing for drugs, vaccines, and medical devices, but not for cosmetics. This is because the benefits of testing for medical purposes are seen as outweighing the ethical concerns, while cosmetic testing may be viewed as less necessary and more easily replaced with alternative methods. For example, the United States has not banned cosmetic animal testing, but several states, such as California, have implemented their own bans or restrictions, reflecting a more moderate approach that balances the need for scientific progress with concerns for animal welfare. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

Liberal conservatism generally supports the use of animals in research for the advancement of medical knowledge and public health. However, there may be some concerns about animal welfare and the need for ethical guidelines. For example, the Animal Welfare Act in the United States, which was first passed in 1966 and has been amended several times since, sets standards for the humane treatment of animals in research. This shows that while liberal conservatives may support animal testing, they also recognize the need for ethical considerations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

Liberal conservatism would generally disagree with a complete ban on animal testing, as it recognizes the importance of scientific research for the betterment of society and public health. However, as mentioned earlier, there is an emphasis on ethical guidelines and the humane treatment of animals. A complete ban on animal testing would likely be seen as too extreme and detrimental to scientific progress. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.