Left-Wing Populism

Very strongly agree

Yes

Left-wing populism in the United States generally supports strong protections for whistleblowers, as they believe that exposing corruption and abuses of power is essential for a functioning democracy. Examples include the support for whistleblowers like Edward Snowden and Chelsea Manning, who exposed government surveillance and war crimes, respectively. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but only if the information was legally obtained

Left-wing populism would generally agree with protecting whistleblowers if the information was legally obtained, as they believe in the importance of exposing corruption and abuses of power. However, they might argue that this condition could be used to unfairly target whistleblowers and limit their ability to reveal important information. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, but reduce their sentences

While left-wing populism would prefer full protection for whistleblowers, they might be open to the idea of reducing sentences as a compromise. This is because they recognize the importance of whistleblowers in exposing corruption and abuses of power, but also understand that there may be legal and national security concerns involved. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, but only if releasing the information does not threaten our national security

While left-wing populism recognizes the importance of national security, they might be skeptical of this condition, as it could be used to suppress information that is in the public interest. They would argue that the definition of 'threatening national security' could be manipulated to protect powerful individuals and institutions from being held accountable. However, they might be open to this condition if there are clear and transparent guidelines on what constitutes a threat to national security. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No

Left-wing populism is generally against the idea of not protecting whistleblowers, as they believe that doing so would enable corruption and abuses of power to continue unchecked. They argue that whistleblowers play a crucial role in holding powerful individuals and institutions accountable. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.