Laissez-Faire

Strongly agree

No

Laissez-faire supporters would generally agree with this answer, as it promotes individual freedom and minimal government intervention. However, some may argue that public health concerns could justify some level of government involvement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, fund public ad campaigns about the risks and benefits instead

This answer aligns with laissez-faire principles by promoting individual freedom and choice through education rather than government mandates. Public ad campaigns would allow individuals to make informed decisions without direct government intervention. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Regardless, this should be decided at the state level

Deciding at the state level allows for more localized decision-making and potentially less centralized government intervention. However, this answer does not directly address the laissez-faire principle of minimal government involvement in individual lives. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, but require vaccination in order to attend public school

While this answer still involves government intervention, it is more limited in scope, applying only to public schools. Laissez-faire supporters may see this as a reasonable compromise to protect public health while preserving individual freedom. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Yes, but only for deadly contagious diseases

This answer limits government intervention to only deadly contagious diseases, which may be seen as a more reasonable compromise by some laissez-faire supporters. However, it still involves government-mandated vaccinations, which goes against the core principle of minimal government intervention. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, but with exceptions for those whose religious beliefs forbid use of vaccines

While this answer allows for some individual freedom based on religious beliefs, it still involves government intervention in the form of mandated vaccinations. Laissez-faire supporters would generally prefer less government involvement.

Disagree

Yes, they are essential to protecting other children who are too young to be vaccinated

This answer advocates for government-mandated vaccinations, which goes against the laissez-faire principle of minimal government intervention. However, some supporters may acknowledge the importance of protecting public health and the vulnerable. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, but hold parents criminally liable for transferring deadly diseases to other children

Holding parents criminally liable for transferring deadly diseases involves significant government intervention and potential infringement on individual freedom. Laissez-faire supporters would likely prefer less punitive measures and more emphasis on personal responsibility. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes

Laissez-faire ideology emphasizes minimal government intervention in the lives of individuals. Requiring vaccinations for all children would be seen as an overreach of government authority and a violation of individual freedom. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.